Sure, the Athlon 64 with its larger cache and larger price tag is faster than the Sempron, but the budget chip still manages to hold its own, and it just creams the Celeron D. In our final test render, we see Intel close the gap a bit. The more expensive Athlon 64 chip is dramatically faster. We use three games, plus 3DMark05, to check out game performance. The advanced profile adds more functionality for encoding WMV files, including de-noise, interlaced, and progressive encoding options. AMD has moved the Sempron line away from Socket A and all the motherboard eccentricities that went along with it, so we have no problem recommending it for low-cost machines.
|Date Added:||24 September 2016|
|File Size:||46.1 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
In the low-budget lines, the tables are turned a bit. Our three test-bed systems had the following configurations: Also, we used the rundll Endnotes SPECapc 3ds max test: PCMark05 consists of a series of amd sempron 3400 benchmark suites, each designed to test individual subsystems, such as memory, swmpron, and hard drive.
All make fairly heavy use of the processor and memory subsystem. With a serious advantage in cache size, we would expect the Athlon 64 to perform better, but it also costs more.
Sure, the Athlon amd sempron 3400 with its larger cache and larger price tag is faster than the Sempron, but the budget chip still manages to hold its own, and it just creams the Celeron D. The smaller cache and lower pin count of Socket help AMD produce Sempron chips much more cheaply, and the small amd sempron 3400 size in combination with reduced clock speeds makes for a cooler-running chip, too. We extract two of the multithreading results from PCMark05 for one set of multitasking numbers, then run Photoshop Elements and Norton Amd sempron 3400 simultaneously as another test.
The games include Doom 3, Painkiller 1.
We can say this, though: We use three games, plus 3DMark05, to check out game performance. Semprom Athlon 64 is amd sempron 3400 bit better than the Sempron, but both amd sempron 3400 quite a bit faster than the Celeron D. The Sempron soundly outpaces the Celeron D, and the Athlon 64 is a little faster still.
There semprno three major differentiators between Athlon 64 and Sempron lines:. Good performance for the price; best-of-class gaming performance; bit support; SSE3 support; and improved memory support.
Sempron 3400+ Review
AMD amd sempron 3400 moved the Sempron line away from Socket A and all the motherboard eccentricities that went along with it, so we have no problem recommending it for low-cost machines. We first performed an extensive set of benchmarks using good old bit Aamd XP Professional. In the real world, application optimizations can vary widely. Now we turn to actual performance using real amd sempron 3400. The reduced cache size affects both a,d and CPU tests. The difference is just enormous, with the Sempron completing the test encode almost twice as fast as the Celeron D.
AMD Sempron + / GHz processor Series Specs – CNET
The more expensive Athlon 64 chip is amd sempron 3400 faster. In our final test render, we see Intel close the gap a bit. AMD has a winner here, despite the relatively high price. In the SPECapc test of 3dx Max 6, which runs scripts 300 simulate interactive model and animation creation rather than simply amd sempron 3400 rendering, AMD steps all over Intel. This Socket CPU runs at 3. The story is the same in LightWave rendering.
We also perform a pair of pure rendering tests with 3ds max, and run the latest POV-Ray 3. The hard drives were defragged prior to each major benchmark run. The amd sempron 3400 profile adds more functionality for encoding WMV files, including de-noise, interlaced, and progressive encoding options.
bit Budget CPU: AMD Sempron + – ExtremeTech
The Celeron line lacks Hyper-Threading, and it really hurts them. It runs at 2. We used Adobe After Effects 6. The performance difference between the Sempron and Celeron is amd sempron 3400 huge.